How to Track Consumer Court Cases on e-Jagriti: NCDRC, State and District Commissions

Why consumer complaints are hard to follow

A consumer complaint does not follow the company. It follows the consumer. Under Section 34(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, a complaint can be filed where the complainant resides or personally works for gain. For a bank, an insurer, a telecom operator, an e-commerce seller or an appliance brand, that means complaints land in district commissions spread across the country, with no single cause list and no single case number series.

So a legal team that wants one view of its consumer exposure has to open many portals, pick many states, and type many case numbers. That is the problem this guide deals with.

How consumer cases are numbered and routed

Last verified: 16 October 2026

There are three levels. The level is decided by the value of the consideration paid, not by the amount of compensation claimed. The present limits come from the Consumer Protection (Jurisdiction of the District Commission, the State Commission and the National Commission) Rules, 2021, notified on 30 December 2021.

Source: Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and the 2021 Jurisdiction Rules, published by the Department of Consumer Affairs at consumeraffairs.nic.in and on India Code.

Case type codes you will see

• CC: Consumer Complaint (the original complaint)
• FA: First Appeal
• RP: Revision Petition
• EA: Execution Application
• RA: Review Application
• MA / IA: Miscellaneous or Interlocutory Application

A number usually reads as type, serial number, year: for example CC/142/2025. The same serial number can repeat in different districts, so a case number is only unique once you also record the state and the commission name. Keep those three fields together in your register.

Check one case manually: e-Jagriti, step by step

1. Open e-jagriti.gov.in.
2. Go to the Case Status or Case Search area of the site.
3. Choose the commission level: National, State or District.
4. Select the state. For a district matter, then select the district commission by name.
5. Choose your search method: case number, complainant name, respondent or opposite party name, advocate name, or filing number.
6. Enter the value. For a case number search, enter the case type, serial number and year exactly as written on your filing receipt or notice.
7. Enter the captcha and submit.
8. Read the result: parties, filing date, present stage, next hearing date, and links to any uploaded orders or judgements.
9. Save a screenshot or PDF with the date you checked. Portal records change without notice.

A search by opposite party name is the useful one for companies. It can surface complaints you have not yet been served in, because the commission record exists from the day of registration. Name searches are only as good as the spelling used by the complainant, so run variants: the full legal name, the brand name, and common abbreviations.

Check filing status on e-Daakhil

e-Daakhil is the online filing portal for consumer complaints. It shows what the case search pages do not: whether a complaint has been accepted, whether it is lying in a defect or scrutiny state, and fee payment status.

1. Open edaakhil.nic.in and log in with the account used for filing or for replying.
2. Open the case list in your dashboard.
3. Check the filing status column: pending for scrutiny, defective, accepted or registered.
4. Once a case number is allotted, copy that number into your register and move tracking to e-Jagriti case status.

Other official routes

• ncdrc.nic.in: National Commission cause lists, judgements and circulars.
• National Consumer Helpline: toll free 1915, for consumer guidance and grievance lodging. It is a helpline, not a case tracker.
• NCDRC telephone IVRS for case status.

Why manual checking breaks at scale: a worked example

This is arithmetic you can repeat with your own numbers. It is illustrative, not a customer story.

Say a consumer durables company has 40 live complaints spread over 18 district commissions in 9 states, plus 6 first appeals before state commissions.

1. One manual check takes about 2 minutes: load the page, select state, select commission, enter case number, pass the captcha, read the stage.
2. 46 matters x 2 minutes = 92 minutes per full round.
3. Checked once a week: 92 x 52 = 4,784 minutes, about 80 hours a year, for reading alone.
4. Add the follow on work: recording the next date, emailing the regional counsel, chasing the order copy. Teams we have spoken to budget roughly the same time again.

The deeper problem is not the hours. It is the misses. A captcha failure, a portal outage on the day you check, or a complaint filed in a district you did not know about means a hearing date passes without an appearance. Ex parte orders in consumer matters usually arrive that way.

Where Claw fits

Claw is software for lawyers, in-house legal teams and businesses in India who need to find court cases, track them, and check a company's litigation history. It reads public court and tribunal records and pushes changes to you, so that your register updates without a person typing case numbers into a captcha box every week.

Two honest boundaries. First, e-Jagriti, e-Daakhil and ncdrc.nic.in are the authoritative sources and the only place to file, reply or pay fees. Claw does not file anything. Second, in the narrow category of software that monitors consumer commission matters in bulk, we are not aware of any vendor, including Claw, that publishes a commission by commission coverage list with refresh frequency. That absence is the reason this page exists, and it is also the reason we are not publishing a ranking here. Ask every vendor, us included, for the list in writing before you buy.

If you want the current court and tribunal coverage position, see /blog/court-coverage-all-india-single-dashboard. For compliance teams screening counterparties rather than tracking their own matters, see #.

Setting up consumer complaint tracking

The pattern below is the one to follow with any tracking tool, including Claw. Screens differ, the method does not.

1. Build the register first. One row per matter with five columns: state, commission name, case type, case number, year. Add the internal owner and the product line.
2. Upload the register in bulk rather than adding matters one by one. A CSV import keeps the case number formatting intact.
3. Add name based watches for the opposite party name, that is your own legal entity name plus brand variants, so new complaints appear before service.
4. Assign a routing rule per state so alerts reach the regional counsel or panel advocate who actually appears.
5. Set alert types: next hearing date changed, order or judgement uploaded, case stage changed, matter disposed.
6. Run a reconciliation in week one. Check every tracked matter against e-Jagriti by hand once. Fix mismatches in case number format before you trust the feed.
7. Re-reconcile monthly on a 10 percent sample. Keep the sample results in a log.

Alerts and reporting that are worth building

Alerts only help if they land with the person who can act. Four alert types cover most consumer work: a new hearing date, an adjournment, an order upload, and a disposal. Route each by state, because the person appearing in Ernakulam is not the person appearing in Ludhiana.

For management reporting, four views carry most of the weight:

• Complaints by state and district, to see where volume concentrates.
• Stage ageing: how long matters have sat at evidence, arguments or orders reserved.
• Orders passed against the company, with compensation and cost amounts, so appeal deadlines (45 days or 30 days, as above) are visible.
• Execution applications, which is where unpaid awards turn into coercive steps.

Who should not choose Claw

• Individual consumers with one complaint. Use e-Jagriti case status and the National Consumer Helpline (1915). You do not need software.
• Teams that need to file, reply or pay fees from one place. Filing happens only on e-Daakhil or e-Jagriti.
• Buyers who need a published, audited coverage list for every district commission today. No vendor we checked publishes one, and neither do we yet.
• Teams that mainly need matter billing, document management and workflow. Compare case management tools instead: #.

Other vendors in the wider Indian litigation tracking market include eCourtsIndia, ProVakil, Legistify and Manupatra. We have not confirmed consumer commission coverage for any of them, so we make no comparative claim here.

FAQs