Depra AI alternatives for agencies: it is the only vendor in this set publishing both a pooled client allowance and your own branding on a client report, which corrects something we published

An agency buying in this category is buying one thing above all others: a container per client, with a report that leaves the tool carrying your name rather than the vendor's. Read on 21 October 2026, Depra AI's agency tier publishes both halves of that, as numbers. 120 prompt slots pooled across 5 client projects, with prompts movable between clients freely, 8 competitors per client, per client reports with CSV exports and action lists, and your logo, colours and footer on client reports. It is the only vendor in this set that publishes a pooled allowance and names the movement of it, and one of only two that publishes branding control at all.

That last point corrects something this site has published. Two of our live pages state that Rankscale is the only vendor in this set publishing branding removal and white label options. Measured against a set that includes Depra AI, that is no longer true, and the correction belongs here rather than in a footnote. Rankscale publishes white label options on its third plan up. Depra publishes logo, colour and footer control on its agency tier. Both are ahead of us, because we publish neither.

The criterion: what pools, and what carries your name

One criterion an agency can check in half an hour: what is the per client unit, does the allowance move between clients once bought, and can a client facing report carry your own branding. Read 21 October 2026, two agents each, bodies saved. We sell a tracker and run an agency plan, so our row is in the table.

read 21 Oct 2026	per client unit	does the allowance pool and move	your branding on a client report
Depra AI, its agency tier	a client project, 5 of them, and 10 on the tier above	yes, 120 slots pooled, and it states prompts move between clients freely	yes, logo, colours and footer
Rankscale	a brand dashboard slot, 10, 25, 50 and 100 across four plans	no, slots are counted, with extras bought in the app	yes, white label options from its third plan
Profound	a client workspace, with its own monthly credit allowance on the self serve agency plan	no, the allowance is published per workspace	not stated on the pricing page
Peec AI	a project, 1, 2 and 5 on its monthly brand tiers, plus a separate agency ladder at peec.ai/pricing-agencies metered in credits, read 21 October 2026	not stated on the pricing page	not stated on the pricing page
Scrunch	a brand workspace, 1 on the plan you can buy and custom above it	no	not stated on the pricing page
AI Knows Us, ours	a client brand, with a calculator on our pricing page	yes, questions and pages set per brand inside one agency plan	not published

On that criterion Depra AI is first on both of the columns that matter, and the pooling column is the one agencies underrate. An agency's workload is not evenly distributed: one client runs hot for a quarter and another goes quiet. A vendor that counts slots per client makes you buy for the busiest month of every client at once. A vendor that pools makes you buy for the busiest month of the agency. The second is cheaper for the same work, and Depra is the only one here that puts the movement in writing.

Where we lose this, and it is the line an agency cares most about

We publish no branding control. Our agency plan is sold per client brand with a calculator on the pricing page, one login with full access and an exportable tracking log for everybody else. That is a coherent product and it is not the same product as a client facing dashboard under your own name. If reselling under your own brand is the thing you sell, Depra and Rankscale are ahead of us on this criterion and the honest recommendation is to look at them first.

We also publish a weekly check where Depra publishes daily on three of its four engines on every plan. For an agency reporting monthly, weekly is usually enough; for one reporting to a client who watches a competitor closely, daily is better and Depra has it cheaper.

What the assistants said when the question named clients

Our standing dataset is 1,260 readings from ChatGPT and Gemini across the United States, the United Kingdom and India. Three of them name Depra in a question that also names an agency, agencies or clients. Within those three, Ahrefs was co named once and nothing else was named at all, and none of the three produced a numbered shortlist.

Three readings is published as three. What it fits is the wider pattern in this data: across all 20 readings that name Depra, every other vendor appears below its own base rate, Peec at 0.20 times its base and Semrush at 0.27. An assistant that names Depra tends to name Depra and stop. For an agency pitching against a Depra incumbency that is directly useful, because it means the client has probably not been shown a comparison at all, and the comparison is the thing you can bring. Our own name appeared in none of the 1,260.

Which alternative answers which agency complaint

• Five client projects is not enough. Depra's next tier publishes 300 slots pooled across 10 projects with 12 competitors each. Rankscale publishes 25, 50 and 100 brand dashboard slots on its upper plans and sells extra slots individually in the app.
• Clients ask about Claude or Copilot. Depra publishes those as Enterprise add ons with the price on request. Rankscale includes Claude and Copilot on every plan. For an agency that is an add on repeated per client against an inclusion, which is the arithmetic to run before switching.
• Clients are outside India. Depra publishes 40 markets on every plan at no extra charge, including the US, the UK, 29 European countries, six Gulf states and Australia, with up to 10 markets per project, and states that a prompt tracked in two markets uses two slots.
• The whole team needs access. Profound publishes unlimited seats and Peec unlimited users. Depra does not state a seat count on its pricing page, and neither do we in the way those two do: ours is one login with full access and an export.

What an agency should ask before it leaves Depra AI

How many clients does Depra's agency tier hold?

Five client projects, with 120 prompt slots pooled across them and 8 competitors per client, and its top tier publishes 10 projects with 300 pooled slots and 12 competitors each. Its own agency page describes up to 5 client brands on that tier.

Can I put my own brand on a Depra client report?

Yes. Its agency tier publishes your logo, your colours and your footer on client reports, alongside per client reports, CSV exports and action lists. Rankscale is the only other vendor in this set publishing branding control, on its third plan up.

What happens to a client's data if we leave?

Depra publishes no lock in, cancellation from billing at any time with access to the end of the paid period, CSV export, a read only MCP server over stored answers, and data retained after you leave. That is the most complete exit statement on any pricing page in this set, and what an agency keeps when it stops paying is the right question to put to every other vendor here. That page is one of the 1,068 of ours, 53.7% of the 1,987 in our inventory, that no stored body on this site links to.

Is pooling always better than per client allowances?

It is better when your clients' workloads differ, which is most agencies. It is worse when you need a hard ceiling per client for billing reasons, because a pooled allowance can be consumed by whoever runs first. Ask for a per project cap inside the pool if you bill clients separately.

Why does this page correct one of your own?

Because two of our live pages say Rankscale is the only vendor in this set publishing branding options, and with Depra AI in the set that statement is wrong. Publishing the correction where a reader of the same claim would find it is the only version of this that is worth anything, and a site arguing for checkable numbers cannot keep a convenient one.