Sign inStart free

WebFX SEO services reviewed on what WebFX itself publishes, and the alternatives worth putting beside it

One of the few large United States agencies that puts its prices and its scoping method in public. Here is what that page says, what it does not settle, and the one question its rate card leaves open.

Published by AI Knows Us · Updated 21 October 2026

WebFX is unusual among large United States agencies in one specific way, and it is the only reason this page can say anything useful: it publishes its prices. Most of its peers publish a contact form.

Everything below is quoted from WebFX own page, read on 21 October 2026, and is presented as WebFX claim about itself. We have no client relationship with the firm and no commercial interest in the answer.

What the published page actually says

At webfx.com/seo/pricing, headed "SEO Pricing: How Much Does SEO Cost? [+Free Calculator]" and carrying a named reviewer, the page opens with the market range rather than its own rate: "SEO costs an average of $1,000 to $5,000 per month for monthly retainers, $75 to $200 per hour for consulting, and $500 to $5,000 per project for specific tasks or projects."

Its key takeaway block is more specific and more useful: "Most businesses spend $2,500 per month, $51 per hour, or $1,000 per project for SEO services, though costs vary based on business size, industry competition, target market location, and the specific services needed." The same table carries a freelancer comparison at "$1,400 per month", and typical durations of 6 to 12 months and beyond for a retainer against 1 to 4 months for a project.

The genuinely rare part is the scoping rubric. The page sets out how a quote is constructed, scoring factors such as market location and market competition on a one to four scale, so a buyer can see the shape of the arithmetic instead of being handed a number. The enquiry form on the same page opens its budget selector at "$2,500-5,000/month", which tells you where the firm expects to start. Its service navigation, read the same day, lists "Enterprise GEO Services" and "ChatGPT Optimization" alongside SEO and web design.

What the rate card does not settle

Three things, and none is a criticism of the firm. A published range is a range: it does not tell you which end your business sits at. A points based rubric tells you how the quote was built, not who does the work or how senior they are. And a 6 to 12 month retainer length is the firm being honest about how long organic takes, which means you are being asked to fund two quarters before the data says much.

The alternatives, ranked on a criterion applied to everybody

The criterion is the only one we can defend: how much of the offer does the firm publish on its own site, where a buyer can read it before the first call? Applied on 21 October 2026, with every figure the vendor own claim.

WebFX first. It publishes both the rate ranges and the method behind a quote. Nobody else in this comparison publishes the method.

A trade specialist second, where your industry has one. Hook Agency, at hookagency.com/pricing, publishes a per service monthly rate for home services: local SEO from $2,800 a month as a starting price for SEO only, paid search from $2,000 a month, and an AEO line at $4,000 a month or $2,000 when added to an SEO package. Narrower than WebFX and more specific about the figure.

Software plus your own time third. Moz publishes "Starts at $99 / month" for all in one SEO, "Starts at $45/month" for AI search and visibility and "Starts at $16 / month" for local SEO at moz.com/products. Cheaper than any retainer, and somebody still has to do the work.

The large national agencies last, because most publish nothing checkable at all. That is a statement about disclosure and not about quality.

The question the rate card leaves open

The evidence is our own audit of 1,872 assistant readings, in which a vendor is counted once per reading whose answer names it in the prose. WebFX was named in 26 readings, 23 of them United States, 2 United Kingdom and 1 India. Percepture was named in 11, all United States. Rank4AI was named in 20, all United Kingdom. Whito is the one worth sitting with: it was named in 2 readings and cited as a source in 65. Those are two different findings about two different behaviours, so this page never adds them together and never compares them in one sentence. A citation is an engine using a page. A naming is an engine recommending a company.

Read the WebFX line in that paragraph carefully, because it is the honest reason this page exists. Named in 26 of 1,872 readings is a real presence for one firm in a market with thousands of agencies, and it is also a reminder of what the number is: it is what five machines said when nobody from the agency was in the room. No retainer on the published rate card includes a report of it.

AI Knows Us is not an agency and is not an alternative to WebFX. We pitch for no retainers and sell no SEO hours. We sell the measurement that belongs in an agency scorecard and is almost never in one: real buyer questions put to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews, never naming you in the question, with the companies named instead reported back. A credit is one buyer question put to one app once. A Claude check costs three credits because the Anthropic API with live web search is the expensive one. Most checks cost one.

Our own ladder is published as plain text at aiknowsus.com/llms.txt, which a crawler reads without running any JavaScript, and it is rendered in six currencies at aiknowsus.com/pricing. Read on 21 October 2026, the United States ladder runs SEO Start $149, Growth $299, SEO Scale $699, Scale $599, Inbound $1,099, Outbound $1,299, Agency $1,299 and Everything $1,799 a month, with a top up of 1,000 credits at $49. The limit matters more than the price, so here is the one that decides which plan you need. SEO Start at $149 is published with 0 buyer questions watched, 0 credits a month and 0 engines, because it is a demand harvest tier, and SEO Scale at $699 is published with the same three zeros. Growth at $299 is the cheapest plan that reads all five surfaces, with 100 buyer questions watched and 1,600 credits a month. Scale at $599 watches 300 questions, Outbound at $1,299 watches 30 on four engines with no Claude, and Agency at $1,299 watches 80 across ten businesses. Managed GEO is published in rupees only, at Rs 88,499 to Rs 2,35,999 a month with a three month minimum, so we quote it in rupees rather than converting it ourselves.

Two rules sit behind every figure we publish. The buyer question never names the business being measured, because a question containing the brand name produces an answer containing that brand name. And every rate carries a 95 percent Wilson interval, so a move from 11 percent to 14 percent on 40 readings is reported as noise rather than as progress.

Where rivals beat us on this criterion, here it is, read on 21 October 2026. Ahrefs Brand Radar at ahrefs.com/brand-radar publishes its unit economics in plainer language than we do: "Claude consumes 8 checks per update", an overage rate of $0.020 a check, a $199 a month plan carrying 83 prompts a day and 2,500 checks a month, and an index it states as 493 million monthly prompts across AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity and ChatGPT, with Claude available on the paid plan. That is six platforms in the index against our five surfaces, and more disclosure of cost per check than we publish. Profound, at tryprofound.com/pricing, publishes "Up to 9 Answer Engines tracked" and "SSO/SAML + SOC 2 compliance" on its enterprise tier. We publish neither single sign on nor a SOC 2 report, and our rendered pricing text carries no white label, no ISO and no data processing agreement. Moz, at moz.com/products, publishes three entry points below our floor on the same date: "Starts at $99 / month" for all in one SEO, "Starts at $45/month" for AI search and visibility, and "Starts at $16 / month" for local SEO.

On this page criterion, published disclosure a buyer can read before a call, we rank ourselves first inside the measurement category on one checkable point: of the vendors read on 21 October 2026 we were the only one publishing price, questions watched, credits, engines and cadence for every tier in a server rendered plain text file. Outside that narrow point WebFX publishes more than we do about how work is scoped, and Ahrefs publishes more than we do about cost per check.

What buyers ask about WebFX

Is the published price the price? It is published as an average and a range with a scoping method, not as a rate card with your name on it. Treat it as the shape of the quote you will be given.

Is a large agency safer than a specialist? It is more insulated against one person leaving and usually broader across channels. A specialist in your trade has the page inventory already built. Those are different kinds of safety.

What should I ask that the page does not answer? Who does the work, how senior they are, and whether the scope names answer engine reporting in writing. A retainer that does not mention it will not report on it.

For the sharpest version of the distinction this page keeps running into, between a firm that sells work and a publisher that gets cited, we keep a separate page on what a research publisher sells that an agency does not. No other page on this site links to that one, measured on 21 October 2026 across every stored body on this site, 2,227 of them against 2,141 live pages, with my own wave excluded.

Read next

WebFX, Thrive, Ignite Visibility, Directive and Percepture compared on what each one publishes about its own workFive American agencies an engine put in front of a buyer, the categories they actually compete in, and the checkable evidence to demand from each before a call.Alternatives to WebFX for AI visibility work, and the sourcing habit that separates it from the rest of the fieldWebFX attributes its headline rating to two named review marketplaces and a review count, which makes a superlative checkable on somebody else's website. That habit, and the first party figures beside it that do not carry one, are the two halves of how to read any American agency's home page.Simon-Kucher pricing strategy, what the firm publishes about its own method and what a Singapore buyer should ask before briefing itThe firm publishes its approach, its scale and four named service lines, and publishes no fee, so the useful work before any call is reading what it claims and deciding which decision you are buying.International pricing strategies for a Singapore company, and the corridor that stops one market undercutting anotherA converted home price is the one answer that is almost always wrong, so set a price per market and keep the gaps narrower than the cost of moving a unit between them.Premium pricing strategy for a Singapore business, and the fence that makes the higher number holdCharging permanently more than the credible alternatives works when the buyer can name what the extra money buys, and the published Singapore writing ladder shows exactly how that is built.Red Antler publishes no price, so here is what its own site does publish and how to cost the same scope from SingaporeRead on 29 October 2026, three pages of redantler.com carry a complete deliverable list, three business stages and not one figure about what any of it costs.

Or browse the whole archive.

See what AI says about you.

The first scan is free, it needs no account, and it asks the questions your buyers ask.

Free. No card. We ask 5 real buyer questions on 2 AI apps.

Already sure you want this? Start free. No card needed, and the free plan stays free. Pay only when you want the work done. Or talk to a person if you have a question first. Or read how we fix what it finds.