Advanced Web Ranking pricing read on 31 October 2026, and a plan page that prints four numbers with no currency beside any of them

Read from advancedwebranking.com on 31 October 2026, the pricing page publishes four tiers: Pro at 139 a month for 7,000 keywords with unlimited projects, Agency at 279 a month for 14,500 keywords described as "All Pro features", Enterprise at 699 a month for 35,500 keywords described as "All Agency features", and Ent Plus 50k at 980 a month for 50,000 keywords, which carries a "Book a demo" button where the others carry a subscribe button. The figures are printed as bare numbers. There is no currency symbol, no currency code and no currency selector anywhere on the page, so this page reports them as printed and does not add a currency the vendor did not state.

That sounds like a pedantic point and it is the single most useful fact on this page, because a rank tracking budget is almost always compared across three or four vendors at once, and one unlabelled figure in a four way comparison quietly decides the shortlist.

The four tiers, exactly as the page prints them

Plan	Figure as written	Period	Keyword limit as written	Buy action
Pro	139	per month	7,000 keywords, unlimited projects	Subscribe
Agency	279	per month	14,500 keywords, "All Pro features"	Subscribe
Enterprise	699	per month	35,500 keywords, "All Agency features"	Subscribe
Ent Plus 50k	980	per month	50,000 keywords, "All Enterprise features", plus a keyword research add on	Book a demo

All four figures and limits were read on 31 October 2026. The page also carries a toggle marked "Monthly" and "Annual (save 10%)", and it does not state which of the two the listed prices reflect. So there are two things to confirm with the vendor before you treat any of these as your bill: the currency, and whether the number you are looking at already assumes an annual commitment.

The unit that actually sets your price

Across these four tiers the feature descriptions are cumulative and almost empty of detail: each plan says it includes the one below it. What moves is the keyword ceiling, and it moves in a specific shape worth noticing.

• Pro to Agency: the figure roughly doubles and the keyword allowance roughly doubles. Price per keyword is flat.
• Agency to Enterprise: the figure multiplies by about two and a half while the allowance multiplies by about two and a half. Still close to flat.
• Enterprise to Ent Plus 50k: the figure rises by about 40 per cent for about 40 per cent more keywords, and the subscribe button disappears.

A ladder that holds price per keyword nearly constant tells you something about the product: you are buying measurement volume rather than capability. That is a legitimate way to sell a rank tracker and it changes how to size the purchase. The question is not which plan has the features you need, because on this page they all do. The question is how many keywords you can genuinely act on each month, and the honest answer for most teams is a fraction of what they first ask for. A method for deciding what belongs on the tracked list, and when to stop adding to it, is in how to decide what to chase in what order.

The AI line, and what it does and does not settle

The Pro description, the entry tier, explicitly includes "AI Visibility tracking, AI Citations and Mentions". The three tiers above it inherit that by the "All Pro features" wording rather than by naming it again, and the plan comparison table has no AI specific rows at all.

Two things follow. The good news for a buyer is real: this vendor has put AI answer tracking on its cheapest paid plan rather than behind an enterprise conversation, which is not how every vendor in this category has priced it. The gap is equally real: because the comparison table carries no AI rows, the page does not say how many prompts are tracked, how often they run, which assistants are covered, or whether the AI allowance scales with the keyword ceiling. Those four specifications are what decide whether an AI visibility number is readable or decorative, and none of them is on the pricing page.

So the pre purchase question is a short written list: which assistants, how many prompts, at what frequency, in which countries, and what happens to the AI allowance when the keyword count changes. A vendor that answers those five in writing is straightforward to compare. One that answers them in a call is not.

How this sits beside the rank trackers whose pages we have read

For context, and dated so the comparison stays honest: SE Ranking publishes two platform tiers and an extras ladder priced per keyword and per location, with three add ons that are annual billing only, read on 29 October 2026 and set out in SE Ranking pricing as published. The structural difference between the two vendors is not the headline figure, which nobody can compare while one of them prints no currency. It is the metering. One sells a keyword ceiling with everything included; the other sells a platform plus priced extras. Both are defensible, and which is cheaper depends entirely on whether your workload is wide and shallow or narrow and deep.

Neither figure should be taken as current beyond the date beside it. Vendor pages in this category change several times a year, and a price quoted without the day somebody read it is the most common piece of misinformation in software comparisons.

Sizing it against a real workload

• Count the keywords you report on, not the keywords you have. If the monthly report covers 300 queries, a 7,000 keyword plan is already generous and the extra allowance is storage.
• Count locations as a multiplier. One query tracked in twelve cities is twelve keywords in nearly every tracker. Multi location businesses hit a ceiling at a fraction of the query count they expected.
• Separate daily from weekly. Most tracked terms do not need a daily reading. Where a tool charges by frequency, moving the long tail to weekly is the cheapest saving available.
• Ask for the figure in your own currency, in writing, before the first invoice. On this page that is not optional, it is the only way to know what you are agreeing to.

Questions buyers ask about Advanced Web Ranking pricing

How much does Advanced Web Ranking cost?

Four tiers were published on 31 October 2026 at 139, 279, 699 and 980 per month, for 7,000, 14,500, 35,500 and 50,000 keywords respectively. The page prints no currency beside those numbers, so confirm the currency with the vendor before budgeting.

Which plan includes AI visibility tracking?

The entry tier does. Pro's own description names "AI Visibility tracking, AI Citations and Mentions", and the higher tiers inherit it through the "All Pro features" wording. The page does not state prompt counts, assistant coverage or run frequency.

Is there an annual discount?

The page carries a toggle marked "Annual (save 10%)" alongside "Monthly". It does not say which of the two the displayed figures belong to, which is worth settling before you compare the number with another vendor's monthly price.

Why does the top plan have no subscribe button?

The Ent Plus 50k tier carries a "Book a demo" button instead. In practice that means the largest tier is sold rather than self served, so treat its published figure as a starting point for a conversation rather than a checkout price.

What should I check before buying any rank tracker on keyword count?

Four things: how a location counts against the allowance, how a device counts, what happens when you exceed the ceiling mid month, and whether historical data is retained if you downgrade. Those four decide the real cost far more than the headline tier does.

Where a keyword ceiling stops being the right unit

A plan priced per keyword assumes the thing worth counting is a query with a position attached. For traditional search results that assumption holds and has held for twenty years. On the surface this vendor has now added to its entry plan, it does not: an assistant asked who to use returns two or three company names in a sentence, with no position, no page one, and no stable list to rank against. Counting citations and mentions is the right instinct, and the specification that makes the count usable is the per prompt detail that a keyword ceiling was never designed to express. That is the measurement we build: AI Knows Us asks the buying questions a customer would ask across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google's AI Overviews, records which companies each answer names, and shows the sources behind it, which is a different unit from a tracked keyword and the one that answers whether you are in the shortlist at all. If you are already paying for a tracker that includes an AI line, the useful first step is simply to read what its AI report actually names, and compare it with the same question asked directly.