Sign inStart free

Best AI visibility tool for enterprise: single sign-on is behind the unpriced tier at five of five vendors, and so, at four of them, is the engine list

Scrunch goes from four surfaces to nine at Enterprise. Profound goes from three to nine. Peec goes from three model slots to up to thirteen. Depra adds Copilot, Claude and AI Mode as Enterprise add-ons. At four vendors the enterprise contract is not buying governance, it is buying coverage, and that is worth separating before anybody signs.

Published by AI Knows Us · Updated 20 October 2026

Read any enterprise tier in this category and you will find two different kinds of thing bundled into one quote: controls your security team requires, and surfaces your marketing team requires. Separating them is the single most useful hour of an enterprise evaluation here, because at four of eight vendors the engine list is what actually unlocks. Scrunch moves from "4 LLMs supported" to "9 LLMs supported". Profound moves from three engines on its trial to "Up to 9 Answer Engines tracked". Peec moves from "Choose 3 models" to "Up to 13 LLM models tracked". Depra keeps Copilot, Claude and Google AI Mode as Enterprise add-ons. None of that is governance. It is coverage, priced as governance.

What actually sits behind the unpriced tier, sorted into two columns

VendorGovernance it moves to EnterpriseCoverage it moves to Enterprise
Scrunch"SSO (SAML, OIDC)", "API access & integrations", "Dedicated account team", custom user licences"Expanded model coverage", from 4 LLMs to 9, plus unlimited countries where Core publishes 1
Profound"SSO/SAML + SOC 2 compliance", API, and history and exports, each listed as "None" on the trial"Up to 9 Answer Engines tracked" against the trial's "ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews", plus custom regions and languages
Peec AI"Single Sign-on (SSO)", "API access", "Custom prompt setup""Choose from all models" and "Up to 13 LLM models tracked", against "Choose 3 models" on every monthly tier
Otterly.AI"Single Sign-On", "Enterprise-grade compliance", "Custom payment options", "Custom terms", "Dedicated Customer Success Manager"Nothing. The same four base engines and the same three add-ons appear on every published tier
RankscaleSSO and trainings on its separate Custom Plan; REST API from its second published tierNothing between its published plan cards, which carry one engine list
Depra AIInvoiced billing with GST, a named contact, and an option to run it on your own server"Every other model as an add-on: Microsoft Copilot, Claude, Google AI Mode and more", plus Perplexity moving from weekly to daily
SemrushNot published on the pages read"Enterprise AIO adds additional depth and coverage for multi-market programs"
AI Knows Us"Enterprise, Custom volume and terms" for "security reviews, invoicing needs or a custom contract". We publish no single sign-onVolume, markets and languages. Our five surfaces do not expand, and Claude is a per-plan yes or no lower down the ladder

The two vendors that do not gate coverage are the comparison worth starting from

Otterly and Rankscale both publish one engine list across every paid tier. At Otterly, Enterprise adds single sign-on, enterprise-grade compliance, custom payment options, custom terms, a quarterly health check and a dedicated success manager, and the engines are identical to Lite. At Rankscale, what changes between published tiers is credits, brand dashboards and page audits, with single sign-on on a separate custom plan and the REST API published from its second tier.

That makes both of them easy to reason about in an enterprise evaluation: you can price the governance separately from the usage, because the vendor already has. At the four vendors that move the engine list, a quote conflates the two, and the first question in the call should be what the quote would be with the surfaces and without the governance, or the reverse.

Single sign-on is the one item nobody publishes at a price

Of the vendors in this set that name single sign-on anywhere, all of them put it on a tier with no published price: Scrunch, Profound, Peec, Otterly and Rankscale's custom plan. Profound is the most explicit, listing "SSO No" against its trial. We do not publish single sign-on at all, which is worse than putting it behind a quote and is the plain answer if your security policy requires it.

The API is the useful contrast, because it is not a universal enterprise gate. Otterly publishes API access and MCP access from its second tier, Rankscale publishes REST API from its second tier, and our own Visibility API appears on two of our published plans. Scrunch, Peec and Profound keep it for Enterprise. So an enterprise buyer who needs programmatic access and has no identity requirement has three vendors to talk to without entering a contract negotiation.

What an enterprise evaluation should insist on, beyond the feature grid

  • The engine list for the exact contract, in writing. Four vendors move it at the tier boundary, and "expanded model coverage" is not a list. Ask for the names, and ask whether Google counts as one surface or three, since vendors here count it both ways and that alone shifts a headline number by two.
  • The unit, converted to your workload. Give them your questions, surfaces, markets and cadence and ask what it consumes monthly. A check, a credit, a response, a prompt slot and a monthly AI answer are five different units across these pages.
  • History and export on the signed tier. Profound publishes "History None" and "Exports None" on its trial and "All time" and "CSV, JSON" at Enterprise, which is exactly the right thing to confirm rather than assume, because your reporting will outlive the contract.
  • Per-surface cadence. Depra publishes that Perplexity is checked weekly below Enterprise and daily on it. Ask every vendor whether any single surface is checked less often than the others on your tier.
  • Whether editing a question resets its history. At enterprise scale a reset on a frozen prompt set is a year of reporting, and no pricing page answers it.

The vendor in this set whose enterprise bundle puts the API, single sign-on and the full model list in one place is worth studying in detail before any quote, and that is set out here. It carries no durable inbound link from anywhere on this site, which is true of 147 of our live pages in this category, counted across 2,054 stored bodies.

So who should an enterprise shortlist

  • Profound if compliance paperwork is the binding constraint, since it is the only vendor here that names SOC 2 alongside SSO and SAML on its own pricing page, with all-time history, CSV and JSON exports and an API at the same tier.
  • Scrunch if you want the widest coverage jump in one contract, from four surfaces to nine, with SSO using SAML and OIDC, unlimited countries and a dedicated account team in the same tier.
  • Peec AI if model breadth is the goal, since "Up to 13 LLM models tracked" is the largest published model count in this set, with SSO, API and custom prompt setup alongside it.
  • Otterly.AI if you want the governance without renegotiating coverage, because the engines never move and Enterprise starts from a thousand search prompts.
  • Rankscale if finance wants a model it can forecast, because every published tier has a price and the per-engine credit weights are published.
  • Depra AI for an India-led programme, and it is the only vendor here that publishes an option to run on your own server.
  • Semrush where the same group owns search and AI visibility across several markets.
  • AI Knows Us where a published ladder and a stated per-check unit matter more than identity management, because we publish no single sign-on, one full-access login per plan, and weekly checks where several of these publish daily or faster.

Questions an enterprise buyer asks about these tools

Why is the engine list part of the enterprise tier at all?

Because surfaces cost vendors different amounts to read, and the expensive ones get used as the upgrade lever. Rankscale publishes the underlying economics openly, splitting its list into GUI engines and API engines and weighting a Claude run far above a ChatGPT one. Once you know that, "expanded model coverage" reads as a cost recovery line rather than a feature, and it becomes negotiable.

Should we pay for nine surfaces?

Pay for the ones your buyers open, in the markets you sell in. The honest test is to ask your top ten buying questions on each candidate surface once, by hand, and see which ones name vendors in your category at all. A surface that declines to recommend in your sector is not worth a contract line, and this test costs an afternoon.

Is SOC 2 published by any of them?

One of the pages we read names it: Profound's pricing page lists "SSO/SAML + SOC 2 compliance" on its Enterprise tier. For the others, ask for the report and its date rather than relying on a pricing page, and remember a pricing page is a marketing document rather than an attestation.

Can we run it in our own environment?

One vendor publishes that option: Depra lists an "Option to run Depra AI on your own server, set up by our team" on its Enterprise tier. Nobody else in this set publishes it, so if data residency is a requirement, ask it first and let it shorten the list.

How should we handle a custom quote internally?

Insist the quote restates the limits in your own unit and names every surface, then keep that document beside the invoice. One vendor here already publishes two different prompt limits for the same named tier on two of its own pages, both rendering on the same day, which is the reason to make the contract the source of truth rather than the website.

Split the quote before you negotiate it

Ask each shortlisted vendor for two numbers: the governance you need on your current usage, and your required surfaces on your current governance. Four of eight will struggle to separate them, because their tier boundary is drawn through the middle of both, and that difficulty is the finding. The vendors that can answer in two numbers are the ones whose renewal in three years will still be comparable with anything else on the market, and for a programme measured in years that is worth more than a ninth engine.

Read next

Peec alternatives for enterprise: the API, single sign on and the full model list all sit on the top plan, so the enterprise step is about the exitIts three monthly tiers cap you at three models with no API and no single sign on, and the plan that lifts all three is annual, which makes the enterprise comparison a question about data egress and identity rather than about prompts.Simon-Kucher pricing strategy, what the firm publishes about its own method and what a Singapore buyer should ask before briefing itThe firm publishes its approach, its scale and four named service lines, and publishes no fee, so the useful work before any call is reading what it claims and deciding which decision you are buying.International pricing strategies for a Singapore company, and the corridor that stops one market undercutting anotherA converted home price is the one answer that is almost always wrong, so set a price per market and keep the gaps narrower than the cost of moving a unit between them.Premium pricing strategy for a Singapore business, and the fence that makes the higher number holdCharging permanently more than the credible alternatives works when the buyer can name what the extra money buys, and the published Singapore writing ladder shows exactly how that is built.Red Antler publishes no price, so here is what its own site does publish and how to cost the same scope from SingaporeRead on 29 October 2026, three pages of redantler.com carry a complete deliverable list, three business stages and not one figure about what any of it costs.Hiring a full service content agency, the five stages a retainer has to cover and the two handoffs where the money leaksMost content retainers buy production and quietly leave strategy and distribution with you, so price the stages rather than the word count.

Or browse the whole archive.

See what AI says about you.

The first scan is free, it needs no account, and it asks the questions your buyers ask.

Free. No card. We ask 5 real buyer questions on 2 AI apps.

Already sure you want this? Start free. No card needed, and the free plan stays free. Pay only when you want the work done. Or talk to a person if you have a question first. Or read how we fix what it finds.