Peec alternatives for enterprise: the API, single sign on and the full model list all sit on the top plan, so the enterprise step is about the exit
Its three monthly tiers cap you at three models with no API and no single sign on, and the plan that lifts all three is annual, which makes the enterprise comparison a question about data egress and identity rather than about prompts.
Published by AI Knows Us · Updated 21 October 2026
Read on 20 October 2026, the Peec AI pricing page publishes three monthly tiers and one annual Enterprise tier, and it is clear about what crosses between them. The three monthly tiers each publish a choice of three models, unlimited users, daily tracking, and prompt counts of 50, 150 and 350. Everything an enterprise procurement review asks about sits on the fourth tier: API access, single sign on, the full model list up to thirteen, custom prompt setup and unlimited projects. So for a large organisation, Peec alternatives is not a question about prompt volume. It is a question about getting the data out and getting your own people in, and both of those are a tier.
We sell an AI visibility tracker. Our own position on this criterion is in the table and it is the weakest row in it, for a reason we state plainly.
Two readings, so the enterprise answer comes from documents
Our standing measurement is 1,260 assistant readings taken from ChatGPT and Gemini in the United States, the United Kingdom and India. Two of those 1,260 asked a question that named an enterprise or a large organisation. That makes the engines a thin instrument for this particular decision and the vendor documents a thick one, which suits an enterprise buyer better anyway: a procurement review runs on published terms rather than on a recommendation. Everything below is read from a vendor's own pricing page on 20 October 2026, under a Chrome on Windows agent and a Safari on macOS agent, with every body saved.
The criterion: data egress and identity, and the tier each one starts on
One criterion, and it is the one that survives a security review: which tier carries the API, which tier carries a usable export, and which tier carries single sign on.
| read 20 Oct 2026 | API access starts on | export | single sign on starts on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peec AI | the top plan, annual | custom CSV exports, a Looker Studio connector from the third tier, and an MCP connection | the top plan |
| Otterly.AI | the second of four tiers, with published monthly request caps of 2,000 and then 5,000 | detailed reports and export on every tier, and a Data Studio connector from the second tier | the top tier |
| Rankscale | the third of its published plans, as a REST API | CSV and Sheets export from the second plan | its custom plan |
| Evertune | cloud bucket and API export on the top plan | data download from the middle plan, plus a data connection to Claude or ChatGPT on the same tier | the top plan |
| Scrunch | its enterprise tier | not stated on the pricing page | its enterprise tier, named as SAML and OIDC |
| Conductor | not tiered on the pricing page, with developer documentation and an enterprise security and governance section published separately | not stated on the pricing page | not stated on the pricing page |
| AI Knows Us, ours | our Visibility API, on the two plans that carry it, read 21 October 2026 | an exportable tracking log on every plan | not published |
Every vendor in that table publishes single sign on somewhere and we publish it nowhere. On an enterprise checklist that is a straight failure for us and we are naming it rather than steering around it. CORRECTED 21 October 2026: this paragraph previously said we publish no API tier, and that was false about our own product. Our pricing page renders a Visibility API on two of its plans, and it did when this page was written. What we do publish on every plan is the export, so the data leaves without a negotiation, and the collection route for each of the five surfaces we name, which is the row most of this category leaves blank. Scrunch publishes the most precise identity line of the set by naming the protocols, SAML and OIDC, rather than the phrase single sign on.
What the three monthly Peec tiers hold, and the one line that repeats
| limit, as published | Starter | Pro | Advanced | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| prompts | 50 | 150 | 350 | fully customisable |
| models | choose 3 | choose 3 | choose 3 | all models, up to 13 tracked |
| projects | 1 | 2 | 5 | unlimited |
| users | unlimited | unlimited | unlimited | unlimited |
| tracking frequency | daily | daily | daily | daily or weekly |
| multi country | no | no | yes | yes |
| billing term | monthly | monthly | monthly | annual |
The repeated line is the model count. Three models on all three monthly tiers means paying more does not widen the surface until the annual plan, and for a business whose buyers are spread across five or more assistants that is the binding limit rather than the prompt count. Peec also publishes the arithmetic itself on the same page, monthly AI answers calculated as tracked prompts multiplied by active models multiplied by tracking frequency, which is the clearest statement of the unit anybody in this category prints and it is worth copying into your own sheet.
No figure in dollars, pounds or euros appears in the document we fetched, so a procurement estimate is built from the limits above and the quote. Peec publishes a customer count instead, stating that it is trusted by more than 3,500 brands and agencies.
Which alternative fits which enterprise constraint
- You need the API before the contract renews. Otterly publishes API and MCP access from the second of four tiers, with the monthly request caps printed, which is the earliest API in this set and the only one that publishes a rate limit you can plan against.
- You need more than three models without an annual commitment. Rankscale publishes its full engine list as included on every plan and Evertune publishes eleven models from its middle plan. Both are monthly.
- Identity and audit are the blockers. Scrunch names its protocols. Conductor publishes an enterprise security and governance section and developer documentation. Those two answer a security questionnaire with the fewest follow up emails.
- Several brands under one roof. Peec's Enterprise tier publishes unlimited projects and Rankscale publishes brand dashboard slots up to one hundred with extra slots bought individually, which is the more predictable shape when brands arrive one at a time.
- You want the measurement method on paper. Peec publishes the multiplication, Evertune publishes a sample count per prompt on its upper plans, and we publish the collection route for every surface we name. Those three are the ones to compare on method.
Write the requirement before you take the quote
Every vendor above answers a demo request and three of them answer with a number only after one. The buyer who gets a comparable quote is the one who sent the same written requirement to all of them: the model list by name, the prompt count, the cadence, the API with its rate limit, the export format, the identity protocol, the data residency, and what happens to the history on the day the contract ends. Fixing that list first is the same discipline as writing a brief before asking agencies for a price, and write the brief first is the version of this argument for buying services. If the answer is partly an internal build, the trade offs are set out in build or buy an AI visibility stack.
What an enterprise buyer asks before replacing Peec
Does Peec have an API? Its pricing page publishes API access on the Enterprise tier, which is billed annually. The three monthly tiers publish no API line. Ask for the rate limit in writing, because the page does not print one.
How many models can Peec track? Three chosen models on each of the three monthly tiers, and up to thirteen on Enterprise where the model choice opens to the full list.
Does it do single sign on? Single sign on appears on the Enterprise tier only. Every rival in the table above also places it on a top tier, so this is a category norm rather than a Peec decision, and it is a question to ask at the start of a procurement cycle rather than at the end.
How many readings does a plan actually produce? Peec prints the formula: prompts multiplied by active models multiplied by frequency. Run your own question count through it for each vendor on the shortlist, because the resulting number is the only quantity in this market that compares cleanly across products.