Best white label marketing agency for your agency, and the four things to settle before your client sees the first report

Whether you spell it white label, whitelabel or white label digital, you are buying the same thing: delivery under your name. The supplier you want is not the cheapest or the broadest. It is the one whose escalation path works at four in the afternoon when your client asks why organic traffic dropped and you do not know.

The four things to settle before the first client report goes out

One. Who speaks to the client, and under what circumstances. Three arrangements exist: never, on a call you host, and directly under your brand. Each is defensible. The one that fails is an undefined one, discovered during a complaint.

Two. What the report says and who signs it. A white label report with the partner own charts, units and vocabulary is traceable in about ninety seconds by any client who searches a distinctive phrase. Ask to see a real anonymised deliverable before you sign, not a template.

Three. Capacity, named. How many accounts does one strategist carry, and what is the onboarding queue this month. Capacity is the real quality variable in this category and it is never on the website.

Four. What happens to your client if you leave. Non solicitation in both directions, data export on exit, and ownership of the work product. A partner that can approach your client directly after termination is a competitor you trained.

The three shapes of white label supplier

The single discipline fulfilment house. Search, or paid, or content, at depth, at volume, with a price list. Easiest to manage and easiest to replace, which is the point.

The full stack partner. Everything under one roof, one account manager, one invoice. Convenient, and the quality is uneven across disciplines by construction. Audit the discipline you sell most of.

The platform with services attached. Software first, humans as an add on. Good value and the lowest service expectation. Check what the human hours actually include.

Ranked on one criterion, applied to everybody including us, and we lose this one

The criterion is whether the supplier publishes the client allowance and the report branding that white label depends on. It is the right criterion for this page and it does not favour us. Read on 21 October 2026:

First, Depra. At depra.ai/pricing, read 21 October 2026, its Scale plan is described as "For agencies running many clients" and publishes "120 prompt slots pooled across 5 client projects", "Your logo, colours and footer on client reports", "8 competitors per client" and "12,000 successful checks per month", priced in rupees at Rs 12,499 a month, Rs 14,749 including GST. Two details a buyer should have exactly. The pooled allowance sits beside a per client figure, which is the disclosure a reselling agency needs to price a client. And that page never uses the phrase white label, so a buyer searching for the term will not find it there even though the feature is published. On this page criterion Depra leads.

Second, Ahrefs, at ahrefs.com/brand-radar, which does not sell white label reporting and publishes the unit economics a reseller needs to price a client: "Claude consumes 8 checks per update", "$0.020/check billed monthly", "83 prompts/day +2,500 checks/month" at $199 a month.

Third, us, and the reason is a limitation rather than a feature. Our Agency plan at $1,299 a month publishes 80 buyer questions, 12,300 credits, five engines and ten businesses on one plan, which is the clearest multi client allowance in this set. Our rendered pricing text publishes no white label at all, no logo, no colours, no client facing branding, and one login with full access is what every plan gets. If the report has to carry your mark, Depra beats us and this page says so.

The general white label marketing agencies are unranked, because none read on 21 October 2026 published a per client price, a capacity figure or a sample deliverable. In a category sold entirely to other agencies that is a commercial choice, and it means the four questions above have to be asked on a call.

The one thing you can resell that is not an SEO report

This is measured rather than asserted. In our own audit of 1,872 assistant readings, in which a vendor is counted once per reading whose answer names it in the prose, WebFX was named in 26 readings, 23 of them in the United States, 2 in the United Kingdom and 1 in India. Percepture was named in 11, all United States. Rank4AI was named in 20, all United Kingdom. Whito was named in 2 readings. Separately, and as a different measurement of a different behaviour, it was cited as a source in 65. A citation is an engine using a page. A naming is an engine recommending a company. This page keeps those two numbers apart and never adds them.

We are not a white label partner and we are not pretending to be one. AI Knows Us is a measurement an agency can run for ten clients on one plan and bring to a client meeting as a finding rather than as a branded report: these three competitors get named by ChatGPT and Gemini when your buyer asks who to use, you do not, and here is the publishing work that changes it. An agency that can walk into a renewal with that number is holding something its client current suppliers are not measuring. It carries our name on the data rather than yours, and for some agencies that is a reason not to buy it, which is a fair reading of the same fact.

Our prices are not a quote. They are at aiknowsus.com/llms.txt and aiknowsus.com/pricing. Read on 21 October 2026, What a tier watches is published beside what it costs. SEO Start $149 and SEO Scale $699: 0 buyer questions, 0 credits, 0 engines, both demand harvest plans. Growth $299: 100 questions, 1,200 scheduled answers, five engines. Scale $599: 300 questions, 3,500 scheduled answers. Inbound $1,099: 200 questions. Outbound $1,299: 30 questions on four engines with no Claude. Agency $1,299: 80 questions, 12,300 credits, ten businesses. Everything $1,799: 300 questions, 3,600 scheduled answers. So Growth at $299 is the cheapest reading of all five surfaces. Managed GEO is published in rupees only, Rs 88,499 to Rs 2,35,999 a month with a three month minimum, so we quote it in rupees rather than converting it ourselves.

We lose this comparison on two counts and both are checkable. Ahrefs Brand Radar, at ahrefs.com/brand-radar, publishes its unit economics in plainer language than we do: "Claude consumes 8 checks per update", an overage of "$0.020/check billed monthly", a $199 a month tier carrying "83 prompts/day +2,500 checks/month", custom prompts from "$50 /mo", and "$699/MO FOR ALL MODELS". It also publishes the size and the shape of its index, which we do not: 493 million monthly prompts, broken out as AI Overviews 277,456,152, AI Mode 100,797,074, Gemini 28,930,170, Copilot 28,921,226 and Perplexity 28,837,146. Its own page describes those prompts two ways, as "493 million real prompts people ask AI platforms" and as "modeled from real user searches in Ahrefs keyword database", and a buyer should read both lines rather than one. Moz, at moz.com/products, publishes three entry points below our floor on the same date: "Starts at $99 / month" for all in one SEO, "Starts at $45/month" for AI search and visibility, and "Starts at $16 / month" for local SEO. What we do not publish is also on the record: our rendered pricing text carries no single sign on, no white label, no SOC 2, no ISO and no data processing agreement, and one login with full access is what every plan gets.

The full agency tier comparison, including the vendor that beats us on report branding, is set out on our own page explaining that Depra is the only vendor in this set publishing both a pooled client allowance and a per client figure. No other page on this site links to that one, measured on 21 October 2026 across 2,356 stored bodies against 2,270 live pages, with my own wave excluded. 948 of those 2,270 pages, 41.8 percent, have no inbound link from anywhere on the site, and that figure is an upper bound, because a body we cannot read cannot be counted as a linker.