Evertune Starter vs Pro compared, and whether the measurement is worth it when the ads agent is priced on media

Evertune publishes two subscription prices and a third price that is not a subscription at all. Read on 31 October 2026, Starter is 60 dollars a month with 5,000 prompt credits and tracking on up to five models, Pro is 800 dollars a month billed annually with 100,000 prompt credits and eleven models, and the advertising agent is charged at 10 per cent of media on Starter and 8 per cent on Pro. Enterprise is custom. If you are weighing whether this is worth it, the third figure is the one that decides the answer, because a percentage of spend is an uncapped line in a way a subscription is not.

What each plan publishes, read on 31 October 2026

Published row	Starter	Pro	Enterprise
Price	60 dollars a month	800 dollars a month, billed annually	custom
Prompt credits a month	5,000	100,000	custom
Models tracked	up to 5	11	11
Statistical significance from day 1, 100 samples a prompt	not included	included	included
Daily monitoring and competitor benchmarking	included	included	included
Ads Agent fee	10 per cent of media, first 7 days free	8 per cent of media	custom
Content Agent	not included	25 articles a month	unlimited generation
Data out	not included	data download, MCP to Claude or ChatGPT	cloud bucket and APIs
Single sign on	no	no	yes
Site audit, bot analytics, fact checker, keyword sentiment	no	no	yes

Two of those rows are the whole Starter versus Pro decision. The sampling row is the thing Evertune is known for, and it is off at Starter: the published claim of 100 samples per prompt, with a margin of error given on the home page as plus or minus 2 points against typical competitors at plus or minus 31, arrives on Pro. That comparison is Evertune's own claim about unnamed rivals and is reported here as read on 31 October 2026 rather than independently checked. The data out row is the other one. Starter keeps your readings inside the product, and Pro is the first plan that lets them leave, including over MCP into Claude or ChatGPT.

The credit arithmetic, computed from their own calculator

The pricing page carries a sizing tool, and on 31 October 2026 it returned 1,500 prompt credits a month for 50 unique prompts. That is 30 credits a prompt a month, which is about one reading a day. Carry that ratio across:

• Starter's 5,000 credits is roughly 165 prompts read daily, at about 1.2 cents a credit.
• Pro's 100,000 credits is roughly 3,300 prompts read daily, at about 0.8 cents a credit.

Both of those per credit figures are computed from the published price and the published credit count, not quoted from the vendor. The question they raise is the one to put on the call: does the 100 samples a prompt setting consume 100 credits per reading, or is sampling counted separately from credits. If sampling consumes credits, Pro's 100,000 is a far smaller prompt set than the ratio above suggests, and that single answer moves the whole comparison.

The percentage of media, in money

A fee set as a share of spend behaves differently from a subscription, and the arithmetic is quick. On Pro at 8 per cent, 5,000 dollars a month of assistant advertising adds 400 dollars to the bill, 10,000 adds 800 which doubles the subscription, and 20,000 adds 1,600 which is twice the subscription on its own. On Starter at 10 per cent, the crossover is earlier: 600 dollars of media matches the 60 dollar subscription.

None of that is a criticism, because that is how media management has always been priced. It does mean the advertising half belongs in a different column of your budget from the measurement half, and it means the terms worth fixing before signature are the ones a media arrangement always needs: who holds the advertising account, what happens to it when the engagement ends, and exactly which spend the percentage is calculated on. Our page on Evertune alternatives takes that further and sorts the replacements by the reason people leave.

Where Evertune beats us, said plainly

The criterion on this page is what each vendor publishes on its own live page that a buyer can check, applied to us as well, and Evertune wins four lines. It publishes a sample count per prompt, which almost nobody in this market does and which is the single most important number behind any visibility percentage. It tracks eleven models against our five apps. It publishes daily monitoring on every tier where we check weekly on your priority questions and at 30 and 90 days on the rest. And its entry price of 60 dollars a month is below our cheapest plan that reads AI apps at all, which is Growth at 299 dollars or Rs 11,799.

Where we are the better buy is also narrow. Claude is inside our subscription on every plan that checks AI apps, priced at 3 credits against 1 for the other apps, where Evertune's model coverage above five is a Pro line. Our pricing page prints the full ladder in six currencies, so a buyer outside the United States can size the work without a conversion. And we publish no advertising product at all, which means our invoice does not move with your media spend.

Who should buy which

• A small team that wants daily readings and no advertising. Starter at 60 dollars, with the sampling row understood as absent.
• Anybody who will quote a visibility percentage to a board. Pro, because that is where 100 samples a prompt begins, and a single reading per prompt is a sample size of one.
• A brand already buying assistant advertising. Model the percentage against your spend first. At 20,000 dollars a month of media the fee is larger than the subscription.
• A team that needs the data in its own warehouse. Enterprise, because exports to a cloud bucket and APIs sit there, and single sign on with them.

Questions buyers ask about Evertune pricing

Is the 60 dollar plan enough to make a decision on?

It is enough to see which way an answer leans across five models, daily. It is not the plan to quote a percentage from, because the hundred sample setting that makes a percentage stable starts on Pro.

Is Pro really 800 dollars a month?

That is the published figure, and the page states it is billed annually, so the commitment is 9,600 dollars a year rather than a monthly rolling cost. Ask whether a monthly billed option exists and what it costs before you plan around the lower number.

How does the advertising fee interact with the subscription?

They are separate charges. The subscription buys the measurement and the agents; the percentage is charged on the media the Ads Agent manages, at 10 per cent on Starter and 8 on Pro, with the first seven days of the agent free.

Does Evertune read Claude?

Claude appears in the eleven model set that Pro and Enterprise carry, and the home page lists it among the surfaces alongside ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Perplexity, Copilot, DeepSeek and Meta. On the five model Starter plan, confirm which five you are getting before you sign.

What is the one number to ask for?

Credits consumed per reading when sampling is switched on. Every other figure on the page follows from it, and it is the only one the page does not state.

What a published sample count is worth

Most of this category reports a percentage without telling you how many times it asked. Evertune prints the sample count, puts it behind the second plan, and lets you do the arithmetic, which is more than most vendors allow. Read the three prices together rather than one at a time: the subscription you will pay, the credits it contains at about a cent each, and the share of media that moves with your advertising. Our own numbers are published the same way and our answer to the same question is different, five apps including Claude on a weekly schedule with the unit defined in words, because we sell the reading and not the media. Decide which of those three prices you are actually buying, and the Starter against Pro question answers itself.

How we know this

We read the assistants rather than guessing what they do. In our own audit of 1,260 saved answers from ChatGPT and Gemini across the United States, the United Kingdom and India, 82.0% of every citation landed on a site the business itself owned, and review directories took 0.7%. Counted as one domain per reading, 16,516 of 20,143.

That is the whole asymmetry: the pages you own are the pages an assistant quotes back to a buyer. See the dated readings and the method on our proof page.

Find out whether assistants name your business, on your own domain and your own buying questions.

By Aditya Goel, Founder, AI Knows Us. Reviewed 1 November 2026.