Sign inStart free

Otterly alternatives for enterprise: no reading in our set of 1260 named it on an enterprise question, and its top tier is the only one here defined by a floor rather than the word custom

Otterly Enterprise publishes a starting point of 1,000 search prompts where four rival top tiers publish the word custom, and its engine add ons stay add ons on that tier too.

Published by AI Knows Us · Updated 21 October 2026

Start with the zero, because it is the honest beginning. Our standing dataset is 1,260 assistant readings taken from ChatGPT and Gemini across the United States, the United Kingdom and India. Otterly is named in 215 of the 718 readings that name any vendor at all, which is the third highest share in the set. In the readings whose question names an enterprise or a large organisation, Otterly is named zero times. A vendor the assistants reach for constantly in general is a vendor they do not reach for here, and publishing that zero is more useful than widening the definition of enterprise until a number appears.

So this comparison is built from documents. Read on 21 October 2026, Otterly Enterprise publishes something no other top tier in this category does: a number. Its card reads "Starting from 1,000 search prompts", alongside customisable prompt tracking, enterprise grade compliance, Single Sign-On, custom payment options, a quarterly GEO health check, a personalised onboarding session and a dedicated customer success manager. Every rival top tier in this set opens with the word custom.

The criterion: what the top tier publishes as a quantity

One criterion, and it is the one a procurement team can act on before a call is booked: on the top published tier, how much of anything is stated as a figure rather than as the word custom. Read 21 October 2026, two agents each, bodies saved. We sell a tracker here, so our own row is in the table.

top published tier, read 21 Oct 2026volume stated as a figureengines stated as a figureidentity
Otterly.AI Enterpriseyes, from 1,000 search prompts4 included, plus 3 add ons, the same split as every tier belowSingle Sign-On, protocol not named
Peec AI Enterprise, annualno, fully customisable prompt trackingyes, up to 13 models trackedSSO, protocol not named
Scrunch Enterpriseno, custom prompts and custom responsesyes, 9, each one listedSAML and OIDC, both named
Profound Enterpriseno, a tailored prompt tracking planyes, up to 9, each one listedSSO and SAML, with SOC 2 named
Rankscale, its custom planno, individual creditsits full published list, on every planSSO, on the custom plan only
AI Knows Us, oursyes, watched questions and answers read a month, per planyes, all 5 surfaces we namenot published anywhere

On the volume column Otterly is first among the vendors here and we are level with it, because both of us put a figure on the top tier. On identity we are last, outright, and there is nothing to soften about it: our pricing page publishes no single sign on at all, where all five vendors above publish some form of it and two of them name the protocol. For an organisation whose identity provider is a hard requirement, that is the end of the conversation and we would rather you read it here than discover it in week three.

Scrunch wins the identity column by naming SAML and OIDC, which is an answer rather than a feature. Profound wins the certification column by naming SOC 2, which nobody else here names.

The line that stays the same all the way up Otterly's ladder

One detail matters more to a large buyer than the prompt floor. On Otterly's pricing page, four engines are included on every tier, ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot, and Claude, Google AI Mode and Gemini are named as extra add ons on all four tiers, Enterprise included. Paying for the top plan does not fold those three surfaces into the price.

For an enterprise that is a budgeting question rather than a capability question. The engines exist, and they arrive as a separate line that scales with however many workspaces a large organisation ends up running. Peec takes the opposite approach by making the full model list the reason to buy its annual tier, and Rankscale takes a third by including its whole engine list on every plan from the cheapest up.

A procurement note about reading these pages at all

Otterly's pricing page answered HTTP 403 to a Chrome on Windows agent and HTTP 200 with the full pricing table to a Safari on macOS agent, on the same minute from the same network, and it did it again today. For a buyer that is a practical warning rather than a criticism: an enterprise procurement team often reads vendor pages through a proxy or a managed browser, and a page that refuses one client and serves another will produce a document review that disagrees with the salesperson. Fetch it twice, from two clients, and save both bodies before you quote anything from it.

The same discipline applies to our own page, where the string SSO sits in the script payload and renders nowhere. A text search of our pricing page would report single sign on as present. It is not, and a check that cannot fail reports good news about whoever runs it. That page is one of the 1,068 of ours, 53.7% of the 1,987 in our inventory, that no stored body on this site links to.

Which alternative answers which enterprise requirement

  • The identity team needs a protocol, not a phrase. Scrunch names SAML and OIDC. Profound names SAML and SOC 2. Otterly, Peec and Rankscale publish single sign on without naming the standard.
  • Every assistant has to be in the base price. Rankscale publishes its whole engine list on every plan. Peec publishes up to 13 models on its annual tier. Otterly keeps three surfaces as add ons on all four of its tiers.
  • The contract has to be monthly. Otterly and Rankscale publish monthly ladders with their top tiers reachable monthly. Peec puts Enterprise on an annual term, which is a procurement decision rather than a feature one.
  • Support has to be measurable. Profound publishes a dedicated specialist with a 24 hour SLA and Rankscale publishes SLA guarantees on its custom plan. Otterly publishes a dedicated customer success manager and a quarterly health check, with no time attached.

Questions an enterprise buyer asks about Otterly

What is actually on Otterly Enterprise?

Everything on its third tier, plus customisable prompt tracking, enterprise grade compliance, Single Sign-On, custom payment options, custom terms, a quarterly GEO health check, a personalised onboarding session and a dedicated customer success manager, starting from 1,000 search prompts.

Does the Enterprise tier include Gemini and Claude?

Its pricing page lists four included engines on every tier and names Claude, Google AI Mode and Gemini as extra add ons on each of the four, Enterprise among them. Confirm the add on terms in writing, because at enterprise volume that line compounds.

Why is there no engine reading behind this page?

Because there were none to report. Across 1,260 readings, no question naming an enterprise or a large organisation produced an answer naming Otterly. The set was built to cover buying questions across three markets and several personas rather than to oversample one segment, and enterprise phrasing is genuinely rare in the way buyers ask.

Which vendor publishes the most of its enterprise terms?

Profound, on four lines a security review stops on: SSO with SAML, SOC 2, a support SLA in hours and an itemised list of nine engines. Scrunch publishes the most precise identity line. Otterly publishes the only volume figure.

How should a large buyer compare a floor against a custom plan?

Convert both into the same product before the call: questions, times engines, times readings a month. Otterly's floor of 1,000 prompts on four included engines collected daily is about 120,000 answers a month, which is a real number to put beside whatever a custom quote proposes. Insist on that figure in the quote rather than a tier name.

Read next

Peec alternatives for enterprise: the API, single sign on and the full model list all sit on the top plan, so the enterprise step is about the exitIts three monthly tiers cap you at three models with no API and no single sign on, and the plan that lifts all three is annual, which makes the enterprise comparison a question about data egress and identity rather than about prompts.Simon-Kucher pricing strategy, what the firm publishes about its own method and what a Singapore buyer should ask before briefing itThe firm publishes its approach, its scale and four named service lines, and publishes no fee, so the useful work before any call is reading what it claims and deciding which decision you are buying.International pricing strategies for a Singapore company, and the corridor that stops one market undercutting anotherA converted home price is the one answer that is almost always wrong, so set a price per market and keep the gaps narrower than the cost of moving a unit between them.Premium pricing strategy for a Singapore business, and the fence that makes the higher number holdCharging permanently more than the credible alternatives works when the buyer can name what the extra money buys, and the published Singapore writing ladder shows exactly how that is built.Red Antler publishes no price, so here is what its own site does publish and how to cost the same scope from SingaporeRead on 29 October 2026, three pages of redantler.com carry a complete deliverable list, three business stages and not one figure about what any of it costs.Hiring a full service content agency, the five stages a retainer has to cover and the two handoffs where the money leaksMost content retainers buy production and quietly leave strategy and distribution with you, so price the stages rather than the word count.

Or browse the whole archive.

See what AI says about you.

The first scan is free, it needs no account, and it asks the questions your buyers ask.

Free. No card. We ask 5 real buyer questions on 2 AI apps.

Already sure you want this? Start free. No card needed, and the free plan stays free. Pay only when you want the work done. Or talk to a person if you have a question first. Or read how we fix what it finds.