Scott Keever SEO is now Keever SEO, with published monthly prices and a rename that moved the site, read on 31 October 2026

If you are searching for Scott Keever SEO, the first thing to know is that the brand now trades as Keever SEO. Fetched on 31 October 2026, a request to scottkeeverseo.com followed one redirect and resolved at keeverseo.com with a 200. Worth noting for anybody doing the same check: a HEAD request to the old domain returned 405, so the redirect is only visible on a normal GET, which is a reminder to read the response rather than the method you happened to use. The second thing to know is more useful. This agency publishes its prices, which most SEO agencies do not. Local plans are printed at 1,500, 2,500 and 3,500 US dollars a month with a multi-location tier from 5,500, and national plans at 2,000, 3,000 and 4,000 with a tier from 7,500. Month to month, no setup fee. Every figure below was read off keeverseo.com on 31 October 2026 and prices move, so check the page before you sign anything.

The published price ladder

Plan	Local	National
Starter	1,500 USD per month	2,000 USD per month
Growth, marked most popular	2,500 USD per month	3,000 USD per month
Competitive	3,500 USD per month	4,000 USD per month
Multi-location	From 5,500 USD per month	From 7,500 USD per month
Google Ads management add-on	1,200 USD per month, plus ad spend paid directly to Google	Same

Two terms printed alongside the ladder matter as much as the numbers. The plans are described as month to month with no setup fee, which removes the twelve month lock-in that is standard in this category and is the single most valuable line on the page for a cautious buyer. And the Ads add-on is explicitly described as two charges, 1,200 a month to the agency for management plus the budget you choose paid directly to Google from your own account, which is the transparent arrangement rather than a blended invoice.

What the tiers actually differ on, which is not the service list

This is the part of the pricing page worth reading twice, because it is unusual. The site states that the same growth programme runs on every plan, and that higher plans buy a larger competitive footprint, more priority services and cities, and more monthly capacity. In its own words, priority services and cities are "the services and locations receiving active optimization, tracking, and reporting each month".

So you are not buying a longer feature list as you move up the ladder, you are buying coverage. Its own guidance on choosing is to start from how many priority services or cities you need in active optimisation rather than multiplying every service by every city, and to pick the plan matching the footprint you need to compete in now if you are between two.

For a buyer, that framing is easy to test in a first call. Ask how many priority services and cities each tier includes as a number, and ask what happens when you want to add one mid-contract. A model priced on footprint lives or dies on whether that count is written down.

The services, as the site organises them

The navigation groups the offering into four lines, which is a useful signal of how the business is actually structured.

• SEO. Local, national, technical, link building, audits and ecommerce, sold as campaigns with plans and pricing.
• AI search. Marketed as answer engine optimisation and generative engine optimisation, with the stated aim of being cited inside ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. The published description names answer-first content, schema and entity work on the AEO side, and entity optimisation, an llms.txt file and cross-engine citation building on the GEO side.
• Reputation management. Review generation, suppression of negative content and repair of branded search results.
• Ads and PPC. Google Ads, paid social and Google Local Service Ads, including LSA setup, Google Guaranteed verification and lead dispute recovery.

Web design and conversion rate optimisation are listed separately beneath those four.

Inside the plan detail, two deliverables are described in a way worth quoting because they tell you how the agency handles the awkward questions. On links, the site says monthly link counts are estimates "because we focus on quality and fit, not hitting a number". On press articles, it says they are written by the agency team and "you approve before distribution", about every three months on the Growth plan and above. Both are the honest version of commitments that are often sold as hard numbers.

The guarantee wording, which is the right wording

Agencies in this category are routinely asked for a ranking guarantee, and the answer is a reliable test of who you are dealing with. Keever SEO's published answer, read on 31 October 2026, states: "No one can honestly promise a specific Google position. We guarantee the work and clear monthly reporting of what was completed." Elsewhere on the same page it adds that "Google and AI tools make their own decisions, so no one can honestly guarantee a ranking. What we guarantee is the work, and you'll see it in your monthly report."

That is the correct position and it matches Google's own long-standing guidance on the subject. If you are comparing proposals, treat any supplier promising a specific position, a specific number of first-page keywords or a guaranteed traffic figure as the outlier rather than the bargain.

One claim on the site is presented as the agency's own and is reported here as that. The homepage displays a 5.0 rating marked "Based on 300+ reviews" above a review provider's name, and an as-featured-in strip. That is a vendor claim with a date on it rather than a figure verified here, and the way to check it is to open the review profile it points at and read the distribution rather than the average.

How to judge this against the alternatives

• Published prices are a real advantage. Most agencies route to a sales call, and comparing a published ladder against a quote shaped around your budget is not a comparison. Put the published figure next to any quote you receive and ask the other supplier to price the same footprint.
• Month to month changes the risk calculation. A twelve month contract at a lower monthly rate is often more expensive in practice than a month to month arrangement you can leave in week ten. Ask every shortlisted supplier for its notice period in writing, not just its price.
• Two lines on the same invoice need separate judgement. SEO retainers and Ads management are measured completely differently, and bundling them makes it hard to tell which one is working. Our page on what to outsource in SEO and how to vet a fulfilment partner covers the questions to put to any agency about who actually does the work.
• Test the AI search line specifically. This is the newest service in the category and the least standardised. Ask which engines are read, how often, whether you see the full answers and the sources behind them or only a score, and who owns the readings when the contract ends.

Questions about Scott Keever SEO and Keever SEO

Is Scott Keever SEO still trading?

The brand now trades as Keever SEO. On 31 October 2026, a GET request to scottkeeverseo.com followed one redirect and resolved at keeverseo.com with a 200 response. A HEAD request to the old domain returned 405, so the redirect is visible only on a normal request.

What does Keever SEO cost?

As published on 31 October 2026, local plans at 1,500, 2,500 and 3,500 US dollars a month with a multi-location tier from 5,500, and national plans at 2,000, 3,000 and 4,000 with a tier from 7,500. Month to month with no setup fee. Google Ads management is an add-on at 1,200 a month plus the ad budget paid directly to Google.

What is the difference between the plans?

Coverage rather than services. The site states the same growth programme runs on every plan, and that higher plans support more priority services and cities and more monthly capacity. Ask for the number of priority services and cities per tier in writing.

Does the agency promise a specific ranking?

No. Its own pricing page is direct about it, writing that "no one can honestly promise a specific Google position" and that what it stands behind instead is the work performed and a clear monthly report of what was completed. That is the position to expect from any credible supplier in this category, and a supplier promising a position is the outlier rather than the bargain.

Does it work with businesses outside the United States?

Its own homepage describes the agency as serving businesses across the United States and international markets. The practical question for a non-US buyer is which time zone the account team sits in and whether the national tier is priced per country, which the published ladder does not state.

Is the AI search service worth buying alongside SEO?

It is answering a real question, because being named in an assistant's answer and ranking on Google are separate events with separate causes. Buy it with a defined reading and reporting arrangement rather than as a line item, so you can tell afterwards whether anything changed.

Doing the work and taking the reading are two different purchases

The AI search line on this agency's menu is the fastest growing service in the category and it is worth being clear about what sits inside it. There are two distinct jobs. One is the work: entity and schema markup, answer-first pages, an llms.txt file, earning mentions on the sites the engines read. The other is the measurement: asking the buying questions your customers would ask across the engines on a schedule, recording which companies got named, and recording which documents each answer was assembled from. An agency selling the first job is the right supplier for it, and a buyer is in a stronger position when the second job is instrumented independently, for the same reason you would not let a contractor sign off their own inspection. The criterion worth comparing anybody on, us included, is how many answer surfaces are read, how often, and whether you are shown the full answers and their sources or only a score. AI Knows Us does only the measurement half, across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google's AI Overviews, and reports the sources behind each answer. It does not do the fixing work an agency like this one sells, which is a genuine reason some buyers want one supplier rather than two.